Allowed

Jaya Devi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC18 Feb 2019B.A./315/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to Jaya Devi, an accused inIPC and Immoral Traffic Act offences, directing release on furnishing a bond and subjects to specific conditions including depositing costs to the Army Welfare Fund.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties of like amount and depositing Rs.5,000 as cost to Army Welfare Fund Battle Casualties.

Jaya Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 315 of 2019

¶2

Jaya Devi ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party --------CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Samir Kumar Lall, Advocate. For the State : APP

¶3

--------- 02/Dated: 18/02/2019

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶5

The petitioner has been made an accused for the offence registered under Sections 290 & 294 of the IPC and Section 3, 4, 6, & 7 of the Immoral Traffic Act.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and not committed any offence whatsoever alleged in the FIR. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 03.09.2018. It is further submitted that co-accused, Dinabandhu Hembrom has been granted bail vide order dated 20.11.2018, in B.A. No.8949 of 2018 passed by a Coordinate Bench.

¶7

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶8

Be that as it may, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Twenty Five thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., 1st Class Jamshedpur, in connection with Mango P.S. case No. 267 of 2018 and subject to the further conditions as follows:-

¶9

(i) Petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the trial court on each and every date fixed by the trial court till conclusion of trial and will cooperate in trial, failing which the trial court is at liberty to cancel

¶10

the bail bonds of the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner is further directed that along with the bail bonds, she will furnish his Cell number and xerox copy of AADHAR Card in the court below.

¶11

(iii) One of the bailors must be close relative of the

¶12

-02-

¶13

petitioner.

¶14

(iv) Further, petitioners shall deposit Rs.5,000/- by way of cost in the account of Army Welfare Fund Battle Casualties being A/c No.90552010165915, IFSC Code:- SYNB0009055, Syndicate Bank, Branch, South Block, Defence Headquarter, New Delhi , Branch Code:- 9055 and will submit a receipt of the same before the court below at the time of furnishing bail bonds.

¶15

Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below and also to the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

¶16

(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)

¶17

Fahim/-

Jaya Devi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaya Devi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Verma Vs State of Jharkhand

Bhupeshwar Singh Alias Muneshwar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bhola Yadav Alias Satish Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dhaniram Murmu Alias Hagru Vs the State of Jharkhand

Munshi Pandit Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kartik Lohar Alias Kartik Lohra Vs the State of Jharkhand