This one-line order disposes of a writ petition concerning employment candidature. The respondent authority confirmed the petitioner's candidature was genuine and recommended appointment, satisfying the grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 997 OF 2018
Arvind Paswan … … Petitioner
V E R S U S
The State of Jharkhand and others … ... Respondents .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK
For Petitioner : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate For the JSSC : Mr. Sanjay Piprawall, Advocate.
06/05.10.2018 Mr. Sanjay Piprawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents – JPSC submits that already case of the writ petitioner and others have been considered and upon enquiry it has been found that candidature of the petitioner is genuine and as such, his case has been recommended for appointment. Learned counsel submits that in view of developments, this writ petition may be disposed of as grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
In view of submission of the counsel for the respondents –
JPSC, this writ petition is disposed of.
RC/
Arvind Paswan
The State of Jharkhand
Dr. S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
