Disposed

Mubarak Hussain And Ors. v. Land Reforms And Revenue Department

Jharkhand HC10 Oct 2018WPC/7332/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand directed the Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the petitioners' claim expeditiously, considering their service history as Parimap Nirichhak, within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No.2 to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the claim within twelve weeks.

Mubarak Hussain And Ors. Vs Land Reforms And… — Service and Employment | Jharkhand HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

W.P.(S) No.7332 of 2017

¶3

Mubarak Hussain.

¶4

Nemchand Prasad Kuswaha.

¶5

Sambhu Kumar.

¶6

Dinesh Prasad.

¶7

Chander Ram.

¶8

Niranjan Kumar Soni.

¶9

Arjun Kumar Verma.

¶10

Raghunandan Ranjan.

¶11

Sanjay Kumar Mehta.

¶12

Mahesh Prasad Sahu.

¶13

Naim Ansari.

¶14

Badri Pandit.

¶15

Bhikhi Das.

¶16

Bhubneshwar Prasad Mehta. … …

¶17

…Petitioners

¶18

-Versus-

¶19

The State of Jharkhand.

¶20

The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand,

¶21

Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi.

¶22

The Director, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Govt. of Jharkhand,

¶23

Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi.

¶24

The District Settlement Officer, P.O. +P.S. + Dist. Hazaribagh.

¶25

The Assistant Settlement Officer, P.O. & P.S. +Dist. Hazaribagh.

¶26

…Respondents

¶27

¶28

CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK

¶29

For the Petitioners: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. K.M.Verma, G.P. I.

¶30

¶31

04/ 10.10.2018 Counsel for the petitioners submitted that suffice it will

¶32

be for disposal of this writ petition, if a direction is given to respondent No.2 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the claim made by the petitioners in this writ petition in accordance with law, within stipulated time, as given by this Court.

¶33

¶34

I have heard counsel for the respondents, who has submitted that they do not have much objection, if such a direction is given to respondent No.2 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the claim made in this writ petition in accordance with law, within the stipulated time, as given by this Court.

¶35

In view of the aforesaid limited submissions, I hereby, direct respondent No.2 or any officer well conversant with the facts and law or any other competent officer to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the claim made by the petitioners in this petition in accordance with law. As per counsel for the petitioners, petitioners were working as ‘Parimap Nirichhak’ since 1999 as apparent from Annexure-1 to the memo of the petition and this fact may be considered while deciding the representation. This decision will be taken as per rules, regulations, policies and Government enforceable orders, applicable to the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and practicable, preferably within a period of twelve weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of an order of this Court, after giving an adequate opportunity of being heard to the petitioners or to their representative.

¶36

After the decision is taken in the manner aforesaid, the benefit, if any, will be extended to the petitioners within a further period of four weeks.

¶37

In view of the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

¶38

[Dr. S.N.Pathak,J.]

¶39

P.K.S.

Mubarak Hussain And Ors. v. Land Reforms And Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mubarak Hussain And Ors. v. Land Reforms And Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anand Kumar Mahto And Ors. Vs State Of Jharkhand Through Secretary Home Jail And Disaster Management And Ors.

Ravi Kumar Vs Personnel And Adminis Reform

Altaf Anwar Ansari And Ors. Vs Education

Raju Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand

Md Safatulla Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors.

Fulmani Bhengra Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr.