Petitioner withdrew writ petition after counsel noted petitioner secured 51 marks, below the 60-mark cut-off for appointment. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 4883 of 2017
Fulmani Bhengra … … Petitioner
V E R S U S
… ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK
For Petitioner : Mr. Pravin Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondents: AC to AG
7/10.10.2018 At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it appears
that petitioner has obtained 51 marks whereas cut-off marks for appointment is 60, which is specifically mentioned in para-9 of the counter affidavit. In view of specific averments in para-9 of the counter affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
Learned counsel for the respondents does not object to the submission.
In the result, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
RC
Fulmani Bhengra
The State of Jharkhand
The Chairman, Selection Committee – cum – Superintendent of Police, Rural, Ranchi
S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court