Three writ petitions arising from service selection tests filed by various petitioners were summarily disposed of. The court allowed withdrawal of petitions on the submission that applicants' grievances had already been redressed, with no objection from respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 3359 of 2017
… Petitioners
Versus
with
W.P.(S) No. 4113 of 2017
Ravi Kumar
… Petitioner
Versus
with
W.P.(S) No. 4568 of 2017
Lalu Prasad Yadav … Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK ----For Petitioner : Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sameer Sahai, AC to AG Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate
2
Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate
---
Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection for the same. Accordingly, the writ petitions stand disposed of as the grievances of
the petitioners have already been redressed.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
punit/
Anand Kumar Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
Ravi Kumar
Lalu Prasad Yadav
S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
