been averred that the petitioner, during his entire service career, has never been put under suspension nor any departmental proceedings has ever been initiated against him, rather, during his period of posting in different capacities under the respondents-CISF, has got appreciation letters which would be apparent from various certificates issued in this regard as per Annexure-1 series. It has further been averred that after the promotion in the post of Commandant, a combined seniority list has been prepared by the respondents authorities on 31.12.2007 for which, the name of the petitioner appears at Serial No. 20 and the petitioner was performing his duties to the satisfaction of the higher authorities with utmost sincerity and was expecting his promotion to the rank of Senior Commandant but in a highly illegal and unreasonable manner, the departmental Promotion Committee constituted by the competent authority for filling the vacancies by way of promotion for the year 2008-09, has been convened in which, although the case of the petitioner was considered but, he has not been given promotion and to the utter consternation of the petitioner, the officers at Sl. No. 21 and from 23 to 28, have been granted promotion in the rank of Senior Commandant but without any reason, the petitioner has not been given promotion in the rank of Senior Commandant. Being aggrieved thereof, the petitioner made a due representation, dated 22.09.2009, before the respondent No.2, explaining in details that from the date of his promotion to the rank of Commandant, he has not been given any adverse remarks and the respondents authorities have issued one letter dated 27.10.2009, issued by the respondent no.3, communicating therein, that he has been assessed not entitled for promotion and therefore, his name has been rejected. Left with no alternative and efficacious remedy, the petitioner has been constrained to approach this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for redressal of his grievances.
