The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for non-prosecution, as the petitioner voluntarily abandoned the matter in the absence of any representation on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 5777 of 2008
…
Dhaniram Mahto … … Petitioner
-V e r s u s-
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. … Respondents
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK.
For the Petitioner : - None.
For the Respondent-State: - Ms. Khalida Haya Rashmi, J.C. to S.C. (L&C)
09/23.02.2018 When the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Ms. Khalida Haya Rashmi, learned J.C. to S.C. (L&C) appearing for the Respondent-State is present.
On 12.01.2018 also, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls.
It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ application.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
APK
Dhaniram Mahto
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
