Writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had expired without appearing when the matter was called out.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 3531 of 2008
…
Jagdish Bhuian … … Petitioner -V e r s u s- Union of India & Ors. … Respondents
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK.
For the Petitioner : - None. For the Respondent-State: - Ms. Nitu Sinha, CGC.
15/21.02.2018 When the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Ms. Nitu Sinha, learned Central Government counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent-Union of India is present.
It is submitted by Mr. M. K. Laik, learned senior counsel that the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the petitioner has expired in the meantime.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
APK
Jagdish Bhuian
Union of India
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
