A single-judge bench observed that petitioners' grievances were redressed during the pendency of the writ petition, rendering it infructuous, and disposed of the matter without adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.3253 of 2011
.... Petitioners
Versus
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents-State : Mr. R. K. Shahi, J.C to A.A.G
28/08.02.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly submitted that during the pendency of the writ application, the grievances of the petitioners have been redressed and nothing remains to be determined by this Court.
In view of the categorical submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the grievances of the petitioners have already been redressed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of being infructuous.
RKM
Janardan Dubey and others
The State of Jharkhand and others
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
