The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel did not appear رغم repeated calls and expressed unwillingness to pursue the application.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 19 of 2011
…
Sanjay Kumar Thakur … … Petitioner
-V e r s u s-
The State of Jharkhand & Ors. … Respondents
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK.
For the Petitioner : - None.
For the Respondent-State: - Mr. Kumar Sundram, J.C. to A.G.
… 14/08.02.2018 When the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Kumar Sundram, learned J.C. to A.G. appearing for the Respondent-State is present.
On 18.01.2018 also, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls.
It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ application.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
In view of the dismissal of the writ application, interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
APK
Sanjay Kumar Thakur
The State of Jharkhand
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
