completion of 12 years of services. The respondent no.3 directed all the concerned Area Education officers to reduce the pay scale of teachers including the petitioner by lowering his pay scale which the petitioner has obtained much earlier as per Annexure-5 to the writ application and the explanation was called for, from the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner along with other teachers submitted their explanation before the respondent no.4. Again, the pay scale of the petitioner has been reduced in the light of memo dated 09.06.2006 as per Annexure-8 to the writ application. It has further been disclosed in the writ application that some of the aggrieved teachers being affected by Annexure-5 dated 09.06.2006 preferred writ application bearing W.P.(S) No.5645 of 2008, which was disposed of vide order dated 15.06.2012 directing the respondent authority to pass an order in the light of order passed in a case of similar situated person and subsequent thereon the grievance of said writ petitioner have been redressed by the respondent authority. On the same ground, one teacher namely Jitendra Kumar Singh filed W.P.(S) No.4970 of 2012 which was also disposed of vide order dated 03.09.2012 in the light of W.P.(S) No.5645 of 2008. The petitioner after attaining the age of 60 years, superannuated from service w.e.f 31.01.2014 but the petitioner's claim has not been redressed. Due to inaction of the respondents in not ventilating his grievances, the petitioner left with no other alternative, efficacious and speedy remedy has knocked the doors of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
