Petitioners failed to appear despite instructions. The Single Judge dismissed the writ application for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (S) No. 6453 of 2008
1.Kumar Anil Singh, Son of late Vijay Nandan Singh,
2.Vinita Kumari, Wife of Sri Arjun Kumar Singh,
3.Geeta Kumari, Wife of Sri Sunil Kumar Singh,
All resident of Village-Kamgarpur, P.O & P.S. Hussainabad, District-Palamau. ... Petitioners Vs.
1.The State of Jharkhand
2.The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.
3.The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, At: Daltonganj.
4.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Palamau Division, Palamau.
5.The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme Officer, Medninagar, Daltonganj.
6.The Head-Master, Madhya Vidyalaya, Kamgarpur, Hussainabad, P.O & P.S.: Hussainabad, Palamau.
.… … ... Respondents
-----CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK
------
For the Petitioners : None For the Respondents : Ms. Khalida Haya Rashmi,
J.C to S.C (L &C)
07 / Dated: 06th February, 2018 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.:
None appears for the petitioners.
On 17.01.2018 and 30.01.2018 none appeared on behalf of petitioners despite repeated calls. It appears that the petitioners do not want to pursue the writ application.
Hence, the writ application is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
Alankar/-
Kumar Anil Singh
Vinita Kumari
Geeta Kumari
The State of Jharkhand
The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
