Lakhsmi Kant Mahto v. State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
This criminal appeal challenged the conviction under Section 324 IPC for assault with a bhujali. The High Court upheld the conviction based on the victim's testimony but, considering the 30-year delay and custody served, remitted the sentence to the period already undergone and ordered compensation.
What did the court decide?
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; compensation of Rs. 3,000 ordered.
What the court decided
1
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) NO. 959 OF 2003
Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 02.07.2003 passed in S.T. No. 273 of 1990 by ADJ , Fast Track Court, Seraikella
Lakhsmi Kant Mahto son of Kailash Mahto resident of Baramtalia, P.S. Raj Nagar, Dist. SaraikelaKharsawan .......Appellant
Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Respondent For the Appellant: Mr. B.M. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate M/s. Nutan Sharma, Advocate For the State: Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwary, APP
PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA
By Court: Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant Sri B.M. Tripathy and learned counsel for the State, learned APP Sri Vinay Kumar Tiwary.
2. This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 02.07.2003 passed in S.T. No. 273 of 1990 by ADJ Fast Track Court, Seraikella whereby and whereunder the sole appellant was convicted under section 324 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. The period undergone during trial was ordered to be set-off.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, as per the fardbeyan dated 21-07-1988 of informant P.W. 4 Sukhram @ Sukra Mahto is that in the evening of 20.07.1988, he had gone to the village Khairbani for taking rice and at about 7 p.m. he started returning for his village to Baramtalia. When he reached south of village Khairbani near a Nala the accused Lakhsmi Kant Mahto armed with bhujali came there and started assaulting him repeatedly with bhujali on his thigh, chest and head as a result blood oozed out from his head and he fell down there and thereafter, the accused fled away. Informant further
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the conviction for voluntarily causing hurt should be sustained despite absence of weapon recovery and medical report.
Whether the appellant warrants further imprisonment after 30 years of occurrence.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Lakhsmi Kant Mahto
- respondent
State of Jharkhand
Coram
Ratnaker Bhengra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cr.A(SJ)/959/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court