The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a criminal revision application by default, noting the non-appearance of the petitioners on two occasions after the case was called out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 304 of 2003
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr. …… Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioners :None For the State :A.P.P
17/Dated: 10/10/2018
It appears that on 06.09.2018 when the case was called out, nobody appeared on
behalf of petitioners and today, also when the case is called out, nobody appeared on
behalf of petitioners.
Accordingly, this criminal revision application is dismissed for default.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Satyarthi/-
1. Manju Devi 2. Thakur Bhandari 3. Kamdeo Bhandari
The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
