This judgment drops a contempt proceeding because the petitioner complied with the earlier order dated 07.09.2017, satisfying the court's demands raised in the preceding writ petition. Therefore, no liberty was granted as the matter became moot upon compliance.
Contempt proceedings dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civ.) No. 350 of 2018 Syed Khurshid Ahmed … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & another … ... Respondents.. -----CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN. ----For the petitioner: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate. For the State: Addl. P.P.
05/11.12.2018. In compliance of the order dated 07.09.2017 passed in WPS No. 7951 of 2012, a reasoned order has been passed by the concerned authorities.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the said order and wants to challenge the same and, thus, liberty may be given to him.
With the aforesaid liberty this contempt proceeding is dropped as the impugned order has already been complied with.
(Ananda Sen, J)
Sharma/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss the contempt proceeding after the petitioner complied with the earlier order.
Syed Khurshid Ahmed
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
