Application dismissed as not pressed due to non-appearance of the petitioner despite repeated calls and prior adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 9637 of 2017
Habal Kisan ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : M/s. Manoj Kumar No.2. For the State : A.P.P. --------
3/ 9.03.2018 No one appears for the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. On the earlier occasion also, when this matter was taken up, no
one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner, in spite of repeated calls and the matter was adjourned.
This application is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
H. C. Mishra, J.)
DS-BS/
Habal Kisan
The State of Jharkhand
H. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
