Marshal Tuti Alias Marshal Purti v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the petitioner's renewed prayer for bail. The petitioner is an accused in an encounter case involving the killing of a police constable.
What did the court decide?
Bail prayer of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No. 8198 of 2017
Marshal Tuti @ Marshal Purti ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : M/s. Jai Shankar Tripathi For the State : A.P.P. --------
- 5/ 9.03.2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chauka P.S Case No. 15 of 2010, corresponding to G.R No.249 of 2010, for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-B)(a), 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act, Section17 of the C.L.A Act and Sections 4/5 of Explosive Substance Act.
There was an encounter between the police party and the members of the extremists group, in which, one police constable was killed. The petitioner was named in the FIR to be involved in the encounter. Earlier the bail application of this petitioner was rejected on merits by order dated 9.12.2013 in B.A No. 9232 of 2013.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has renewed the prayer for
bail.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Marshal Tuti @ Marshal Purti, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, accused in encounter involving death of a police constable, should be granted bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Marshal Tuti @ Marshal Purti
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
H. C. Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- B.A./8198/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court