Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Permission to withdraw was granted, and the application was dismissed as not pressed.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No.584 of 2018
Mithun Gaddi @ Raja …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioner :Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the State :A.P.P.
02/Dated: 05/03/2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Satyarthi/-
Mithun Gaddi Raja
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
