The petitioner filed two applications for anticipatory bail regarding FIRs involving cheating and misappropriation. The High Court rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail on the grounds that the petitioner was not inclined to admit same in view of the nature of allegations made in the FIRs.
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 514 of 2018
| Rajesh Jha @ Rajesh Kumar Jha ….. Versus |
Petitioner |
|---|---|
| The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ….. With |
Opp. Party |
| A.B.A. No. 515 of 2018 | |
| Rajesh Jha @ Rajesh Kumar Jha ….. Versus |
Petitioner |
| The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ….. |
Opp. Party |
--------CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N.Upadhyay, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Sanjeeb Kr. Singh, Adv. --------- 06/Dated: 10/09/2018
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.135 of 2017, corresponding to G.R.No.2159 of 2017, registered under Sections 420, 422, 409,34 of the IPC and in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.143 of 2017, corresponding to G.R.No.2218 of 2017, registered under Sections 420, 406,34 of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and not committed any offences whatsoever alleged in the F.I.R.
Pursuant to order dated 23.07.2018, both the parties along with their counsels have appeared.
In view of nature of allegation, I am not inclined to admit the petitioner on anticipatory bail in both applications. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
fahim/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the two bail applications before the High Court.
Whether the petitioner has been falsely implicated in cases registered under Sections 420, 422, 409, 34 of IPC and Sections 420, 406, 34 of IPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Jha
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
