Urmila Devi v. Suman Samanta
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order dismissed a civil revision for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear on the hearing date despite prior notice.
What did the court decide?
Revision dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No.24 of 2016
Urmila Devi, wife of Late Ramawatar Sharma, resident of Punjabi Mohalla, Durga Mandap Gali, Giridih, P.O. Giridih, P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih …… Petitioner
Versus Suman Samanta, son of Late Ras Bihari Samanta, resident of Buxidih, P.O.Giridih, P.S. Giridih Town, District - Giridih …… Opp. Party
--------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
--------For the Petitioner : NONE For the Opp. Party : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate ----------------------------
07 / Dated : 12th February, 2018
1. Mr. Bibhash Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party is in attendance.
2. It appears that on 05.10.2017 none had appeared on behalf of petitioner and opportunity was also given to the petitioner to prosecute the case on the next date and it was made clear that if none appears on the next date, the revision shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Today, on repeated call none appears on behalf of petitioner. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, this civil revision stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Urmila Devi
- respondent
Suman Samanta
Coram
Amitav K. Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- C.R./24/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court