Puran Mandal v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.…
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 222 of 2018
Puran Mandal …. …. Petitioner(s).
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opp. Party(s) ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN.
-----For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate For the State : A.P.P.
05/18.04.2018
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 304B/34 IPC.
Petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased. This is a case of 100% burn injury.
In view of the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner above named in connection with Margomunda P.S. Case No. 77 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 736 of 2017, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur at Deoghar stands rejected.
(ANANDA SEN , J)
anjali/ C.P 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the father-in-law of a deceased woman in a case of alleged dowry death involving burns.
Puran Mandal
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court