Allowed

Digamber Pramanik And Ors. v. The State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC4 Jul 2018A.B.A./220/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to eight petitioners charged under various sections of IPC in a complaint case. The court directed them to surrender within four weeks; upon arrest or surrender, they were to be enlarged on bail with specific bond deposits and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender within four weeks; enlarged on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and depositing Rs. 4,000 each.

Digamber Pramanik And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 220 of 2018

¶2

Digambar Pramanik

¶3

Maruti Mahato

¶4

Sonaram Mahato

¶5

Rampad Mahato

¶6

Ruplal Mahato

¶7

Haru Mahato

¶8

Ranjit Mahato

¶9

Mahadeo Mahato …… Petitioner

¶10

Versus

¶11

1.The State of Jharkhand

¶12

Mihir Chandra Mahto …… Opposite Parties --------CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P ---------

¶13

07/Dated: 04/07/2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.

¶15

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 341, 323, 379, 384, 504, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. It is also submitted that a proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C has been initiated between the parties.

¶17

Learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 and A.P.P have opposed the prayer for bail.

¶18

In the fact and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of their arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge them on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro in connection with Complaint Case No. 708 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, subject to the further condition that on the date of surrender petitioners shall deposit Rs. 4,000/- each (total Rs. 32,000/-) before the court below. Thereafter, the trial Court will issue notice to the O.P. No.2 and after appearance, the trial Court shall release the aforesaid amount in his favour after proper verification.

¶19

(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)

¶20

Satayendra/

Digamber Pramanik And Ors. v. The State Of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Digamber Pramanik And Ors. v. The State Of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Afjal Ansari Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Bipta Oraon And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr.

Shishupal Rana Vs the State of Jharkhand

Nehla Khatoon Alias Nehala Praveen Alias Nehala Khatoon Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manohar Mandal And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Dipak Das Vs the State of Jharkhnad