Allowed

Kailash Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC24 Sept 2018A.B.A./2019/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving offences under various IPC sections, directing surrender under specific conditions and bail bond amounts, subject to verification of a compromise petition by the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to surrender and granted anticipatory bail subject to bond of Rs. 20,000 each and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Kailash Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B. A. No. 2019 of 2018

¶3

Kailash Yadav

¶4

Vijay Yadav

¶5

Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar Yadav

¶6

Malwa Devi @ Malwa Devi @ Malabi Devi …… Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Jharkhand …........Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH

¶9

For the Petitioners :M/s. Vineeta Sharma, Advocate For the State :A.P.P.

¶10

07/Dated: 24/09/2018

¶11

Despite valid service of notice, O.P. No. 2 failed to appear.

¶12

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Gawan P.S. Case No. 91 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 2936 of 2017 for the offence under sections 341, 223, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. There is general and vague allegations against the petitioners. Further, it has been submitted that both the parties have compromised the case and a joint compromise petition has already been filed.

¶14

Learned A.P.P opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶15

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of their arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge the above named petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand)each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned A.C.J.M, Giridih in connection with Gawan P.S. Case No. 91 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 2936 of 2017 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner nos. 1 to 3 are directed to deposit Rs. 10,000/- each before the trial court on the date of their surrender. However, deposition of aforesaid amount will not affect the case of the petitioners during trial. Thereafter, trial court will issue notice to the O.P. No. 2 and after her appearance, the aforesaid amount would be released in favour of O.P. No. 2 after making proper verification.

¶16

(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)

¶17

Satyarthi/-

Kailash Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Kumar Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Narayan Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sudama Poddar Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Mehtab Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manish Kumar Tayal Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Mahfil Ansari Alias Maiful Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand