In a bail application under Section 392 IPC, Justice Ananda Sen rejected the petitioners prayer for release, noting their identification as miscreants during the T.I. Parade and naming them in the information.
The prayer for bail was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1507 of 2018
Mansa Lohar …......... Petitioner(s).
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s).
------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN . -----For the Petitioner(s) :Mr. Arun Kr. Pandey, Advocate. For the State :A.P.P.
04/13.04.2018: Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail.
The petitioner is an accused for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with MGM P.S. Case No. 74/2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 2781 of 2017, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur.
Since the petitioner has been identified as one of the miscreants by the informant in T.I. Parade, I am not inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, namely, Mansa Lohar, is rejected .
(ANANDA SEN , J.)
Anu/-C.P.-3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, accused under Section 392 IPC, should be released on bail given he was identified as a miscreant in the T.I. Parade.
Mansa Lohar
The State of Jharkhand
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
