Saiman Hansda Vs the State of Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1462 of 2018

Saiman Hansda @ Siman Hansdak …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party

With A.B.A. No. 1101 of 2018

Ravi Kumar …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 1109 of 2018 Saiman Hembram @ Saiman Kumar Hembram …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 1084 of 2018 Surandra Narayan Sah @ Surendra Narayan Sah …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 1099 of 2018 Cornelius Tudu …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 1106 of 2018 Lakhan Soren @ Lokhan Soren …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 1289 of 2018 Hiralal Mandal …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 1583 of 2018 Mohd. Zafar Hasnat @ Md. Zafar Hasnat …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 2557 of 2018 Janardan Rai …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 1374 of 2018 Kishor Yadav @ Kishor Kumar Yadav …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …… Opposite Party --------CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : M/sIndu Shekhar Gupta, M.K. Mehta S.K Dwivedy,R.S Majumdar,Nitu Sinh S.P.Roy Advocates. For the State : A.P.P ---------

¶5

05/Dated: 17/07/2018

¶6

A.B.A. No. 1462 of 2018

¶7

Saiman Hansda @ Siman Hansdak

¶8

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of C.J.M Pakur.

¶9

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is the Post Master of Hiranpur Sub-post office.

¶10

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶11

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Saiman Hansda @ Siman Hansdak, is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, subject to the further condition that on the date of surrender, petitioner shall deposit Rs. 20,000/ - in the trial Court. The aforesaid deposition is subject to the result of the case and will not prejudice the case of the petitioner during trial.

¶12

A.B.A. No. 1109 of 2018

¶13

Saiman Hembram @ Saiman Kumar Hembram

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.MIst Class Pakur.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner.

¶16

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶17

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Saiman Hembram @ Saiman Kumar Hembram, is directed to to surrender in the Court

¶18

-3-

¶19

below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C,

¶20

A.B.A. No. 1084 of 2018

¶21

Surandra Narayan Sah @ Surendra Narayan Sah

¶22

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M Pakur.

¶23

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner.

¶24

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶25

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Surandra Narayan Sah @ Surendra Narayan Sah, is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C ,

¶26

A.B.A. No. 1583 of 2018

¶27

Mohd. Zafar Hasnat @ Md. Zafar Hasnat

¶28

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M Pakur.

¶29

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner. It is submitted that the

¶30

-4-

¶31

petitioner is the Block Panchayat Raj Officer.

¶32

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶33

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Mohd. Zafar Hasnat @ Md. Zafar Hasnat , is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, subject to the further condition that on the date of surrender, petitioner shall deposit Rs. 2,60,000 /- in the trial Court. The aforesaid deposition is subject to the result of the case and will not prejudice the case of the petitioner during trial.

¶34

A.B.A No. 2557 of 2018

¶35

Janardan Rai

¶36

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M Pakur.

¶37

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is the Nazir of Hiranpur .

¶38

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶39

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Janardan Rai , is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, subject to the further condition that on the date of surrender, petitioner shall deposit Rs. 25,000 /- in the trial Court. The aforesaid deposition is subject to the result of the case and will not prejudice the case of the petitioner during

¶40

trial.

¶41

A.B.A No. 1374 of 2018 Kishor Yadav @ Kishor Kumar Yadav

¶42

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M Pakur.

¶43

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is the Gram Sewak.

¶44

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶45

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Kishor Yadav @ Kishor Kumar Yadav is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, subject to the further condition that on the date of surrender, petitioner shall deposit Rs. 20,000 /- in the trial Court. The aforesaid deposition is subject to the result of the case and will not prejudice the case of the petitioner during trial.

¶46

A.B.A. No. 1099 of 2018

¶47

Cornelius Tudu

¶48

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M Pakur.

¶49

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner is the Rojgar Sewak.

¶50

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶51

-6-

¶52

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Cornelius Tudu is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, Further subject to the condition that petitioner shall deposit Rs. 20,000 /- in the trial Court. The aforesaid deposition is subject to the result of the case and will not prejudice the case of the petitioner during trial.

¶53

A.B.A. No. 1289 of 2018

¶54

Hiralal Mandal

¶55

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M Pakur.

¶56

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner.

¶57

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶58

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Hiralal Mandal is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C,

¶59

A.B.A. No. 1101 of 2018

¶60

Ravi Kumar

¶61

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M Pakur.

¶62

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not

¶63

-7-

¶64

committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner.

¶65

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶66

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Ravi Kumar is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C,

¶67

A.B.A. No. 1106 of 2018

¶68

Lakhan Soren @ Lokhan Soren

¶69

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018 for the offence under sections 406/420/467/468 /471/ 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M Pakur.

¶70

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and there is no connection of the petitioner in relation to MNREGA Scheme, so no offence is made out against the petitioner.

¶71

The learned A.P.P. opposed the bail

¶72

Be that as it may, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, Lakhan Soren @ Lokhan Soren is directed to to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M Pakur. in connection with Hiranpur P.S Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to G.R Case No. 89 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C,

¶73

(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)

¶74

SD

Saiman Hansda v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saiman Hansda v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mantosh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr.

Imran Qureshi Alias Badku Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Tridip Ghosh Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr.

Ejaj Ahmad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rohit Pal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mangal Pandit Vs the State of Jharkhand