On 08.10.2017, the High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi, disposed of a contempt petition. The Court held that the filing of a show-cause indicates compliance with previous directions regarding Deferred Dearness Allowance, thus precluding deliberate disobedience.
The contempt petition has been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 309 of 2016
9.Dr.(Mrs.) Vanmala Choudhary 10.Dr. Mani Sinha @ Mani Singh 11.Mrs.Rajni Sharma 12.Dr.(Mrs.) Usha Singh 13.Dr.(Mrs.)Saraswati Modak 14.Dr.(Mrs.) Aparna Mukherjee 15.Dr.Nirmala Yadav 16.Mr. Sundar Singh ….... Petitioners Vrs.
1.State of Jharkhand
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
For the Petitioner : Om Prakash Tiwari For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Mithilesh Singh (for VBU) : J.C to G.P.V
08/10.08.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
-2-
specifically say about payment of any interest.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
A.Mohanty
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the challenge to the order in the contempt petition requires disposal given compliance with earlier directions.
Dr. Shashi Bhushan Choudhry and others
State of Jharkhand and others
Apareesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
