Allowed restoration of WPC No. 6115/2012 which was previously dismissed for non-prosecution despite a four-year delay in removing a defect, subject to payment of costs and timely establishment of the fixation of rent.
Restoration of WPC No. 6115/2012 subject to payment of Rs. 1,500/- and removal of surviving defect within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 148 of 2017
Abhimanyu Roy -----Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ----- Opp. Parties
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate For the OP. - State: Mr. Sunil Kumar, JC to SC (Mines)
03/ 04.08.2017 Heard counsel for the parties.
( Aparesh Kumar Singh, J )
Ranjeet/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to delayed removal of a technical defect can be restored upon later compliance.
Whether the petitioner has shown sufficient diligence in removing the defect in the writ petition.
Abhimanyu Roy
The State of Jharkhand
Aparesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
