A contempt application was dropped because the respondent authorities complied with a previous order, rendering no substance left to decide. The petitioners were directed to seek redress elsewhere from the appropriate authority.
Contempt application dropped; petitioners directed to approach appropriate authority for redressal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. (Cvl.) No.276 of 2017
Versus
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA
For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal, Advocate Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.G. For RINPAS : Mr. Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate -----
7/01.12.2017 Pursuant to the Order dated 1.09.2016 passed in WP(S) No.5639 of 2015,
the required decision has been taken by the respondent authorities, which has
been brought on record by way of show-cause.
In that view of the matter, nothing remains to be decided in the contempt application.
This contempt proceeding is accordingly, dropped and this contempt application stands dismissed.
The petitioners, if aggrieved by the decision, may move the appropriate authority for redressal of their grievances.
(H. C. Mishra, J.)
R.Kumar
Dr. Rekha Roy and Others
The State of Jharkhand and Others
H.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
