C.M.P. No. 283 of 2011. The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition for non-prosecution despite a previous indulgence of three weeks to file supplementary documents.
Dismissal of the petition for non-prosecution due to failure to file supplementary affidavit and substitution petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 283 of 2011
Union of India -----Petitioner Versus Najim Mistry & another ----- Opp. Parties
CORAM: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh
( Aparesh Kumar Singh, J )
Ranjeet/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the petitioner to file a supplementary affidavit and substitution petition or dismiss the petition for non-prosecution given the time was expired.
Union of India
Najim Mistry
Aparesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
