Bhavesh Pandit and Ors. v. the State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 1188…
COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 1188…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 1188 of 2015
4.Tarkeshwari Devi @ Lalita Devi ... ... ... Petitioners Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
... ... ... Opp. Parties
CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
............
For the Petitioners : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Mr. Naresh Pd. Thakur For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. N.K. Sahani, Advocate
4/05.07.2016
Heard Md. Zaid Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. N.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2.
Mr. N.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2, at the outset, has stated that in this case, charge has already been framed and two witnesses have been examined.
In view of the facts that there is sufficient progress in the trial and even the impugned order dated 12.08. 2015 does not speak of any error or illegality, I am not inclined to entertain this application.
However, petitioner is at liberty to raise all the points before the learned trial court at the appropriate stage.
This application stands disposed of.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Binit
Bhavesh Pandit
Gujar Mahto
Babita Devi
Tarkeshwari Devi
The State of Jharkhand
Smt. Bimla Pandit
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court