It has been submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that a case was instituted against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 420/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned senior counsel submits that at the behest of the well wishers, matter has been compromised outside the court and considering the compromise so arrived at, apart from the merits of the case, as well as period of detention, the petitioner had undergone, she had been granted regular bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Chaibasa on 08.01.2015. Learned senior counsel submits that the impugned order dated 26.09.2015 has restricted itself only to the terms and conditions of the compromise without looking into the fact that the bail granted to the petitioner was also on the merits of the case, as well as the custody, she had undergone. Learned senior counsel further submits that mere breach of terms and conditions of the bail cannot be a ground for cancellation of bail. It has also been submitted that in fact the agreement which was entered into between the petitioner and the informant was under threat and coercion. It has therefore been submitted that the requirement for cancellation of bail has not been properly appreciated by the learned Sessions Judge and therefore the impugned order dated 26.09.2015
