In an anticipatory bail application, no one appeared for the petitioner to press the matter. The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of the application by dismissing it for non-prosecution.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4356 of 2015
Bhuneshwar Mahto .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party --CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --For the Petitioner : None For the State : A.P.P. --- Order No. 09 Dated 6th April 2016
No one appears for the petitioner to press this anticipatory bail application.
The application is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
MK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner should be disposed of when no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the application.
Bhuneshwar Mahto
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
