This order is a one-line listing note stating that the petitioner failed to appear and noting the continuation of a date pending hearing.
The court noted the absence of the petitioner in a matter continuation order but deferred substantive disposition till the next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2105 of 2016
Ravindra Kumar Paswan @ Rabindra Paswan @ Rabo …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P.
07/ Dated 3rd October, 2016
Nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. Put up this case after Puja Vacation.
Till then, interim relief granted vide order dated 24.08.2016 shall continue.
(A.B.Singh, J.)
Anjali /-
Ravindra Kumar Paswan @ Rabindra Paswan @ Rabo
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
