An anticipatory bail application was dismissed as it was not pressed by the petitioner, following the quashing of the underlying criminal proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1273 of 2015
Anoop Kumar Sengupta .... Petitioner Versus
The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. … Opposite Party --CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the CBI : Mr. K. P. Deo --- Order No. 09 Dated 4th April 2016
Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not press this anticipatory bail application, in view of the fact that the criminal proceeding has been quashed and set aside so far as the petitioner is concerned.
The application is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
MK
Anoop Kumar Sengupta
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
