The High Court of Jharkhand permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition via an interlocutory application. Consequently, the main writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the same judge.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7811 of 2013
Indrajit Roy, S/o- Sri Sujit Kumar Roy, Flat No. G-02, Anandamani Estates, J.C. Road, Lalpur, Ranchi ... ... Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Sweety Topno, Advocate
03/09.01.2015 I.A. No. 27 of 2015
In the interlocutory application, the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, I.A. No. 27 of 2015 is allowed.
W.P. (C) No. 7811 of 2013
In view of the order passed in I.A. No. 27 of 2015, the
writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Tanuj/-
Indrajit Roy
National Highways Authority of India and Others
Shree Chandrashekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
