Partly allowed

Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. Thr Its Unit Head Projects Sri K K Gangogopadhyay v. Central Coalfields Ltd. Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director And Ors.

Jharkhand HC8 Jan 2015WPC/2868/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the withdrawal of this writ petition, dismissing it and granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority. Adjacent interim applications were dismissed as not pressed.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to withdraw the writ petition allowed; petition dismissed with liberty to work out remedy as per law.

Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. Thr… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Jharkhand HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C)No. 2868 of 2014

¶2

Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. (HSCL), a Government of India Undertaking under the Ministry of Steel, Government of Indian incorporated under Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at P-34 A, Gariahat Road (South), PO & PS Gariahat, District Kolkata, West Bengal and one of its unit at Bokaro Steel City, PO & PS Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro, through its Unit Head (Projects), I/c Sri K.K. Gangogopadhyay, S/O Late N. B. Gangogopadhya, R/O Qr. No. Sec-i/B, B.S.C.T, PO, PS & Dist. Bokaro

¶3

… Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

Central Coalfields Ltd. through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Dharbhanga House, PO Ranchi University, PS Gonda, District Ranchi

¶6

The Director (Tech./Oprn), Central Coalfields Ltd., Dharbhanga House, PO Ranchi University, PS Gonda, District Ranchi

¶7

General Manager (CMC), Central Coalfields Ltd., Dharbhanga House, PO Ranchi University, PS Gonda, District Ranchi

¶8

General Manager, Dhori Area, Central Coalfields Ltd., PO & PS Dhori Dist. Bokaro

¶9

General Manager (Operations), Dhori Area, Central Coalfields Ltd., PO & PS Dhori Dist. Bokaro

¶10

Project Officer, Amlo Project, Dhori Area, Central Coalfields Ltd., PO & PS Dhori Dist. Bokaro

¶11

... Respondents

¶12

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

¶13

-----For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Rohit Roy, Advocate For the Respondent-C.C.L: Mr. J. Dhankar, Sr. Advocate

¶14

Mr. A. K. Das, Advocate

¶15

06/08.01.2015 Mr. J. Dhankar, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondent-C.C.L raises objection as to the maintainability of this writ petition on the ground that the writ petition involves serious disputed question of fact.

¶16

Faced with this situation, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the

¶17

writ petition to work out its remedy in accordance with law.

¶18

The learned Senior counsel Mr. J. Dhankar, appearing for the respondent-C.C.L has no objection.

¶19

Prayer is allowed.

¶20

Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to work out its remedy in accordance with law.

¶21

I.A. Nos. 3501/2014 and 3502/2014 also stand dismissed as not pressed.

¶22

(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)

¶23

Amit/

Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. Thr Its Unit Head Projects Sri K K Gangogopadhyay v. Central Coalfields Ltd. Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd. Thr Its Unit Head Projects Sri K K Gangogopadhyay v. Central Coalfields Ltd. Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesh Kumar Singh Vs Anita Devi

Raj Kishor Sharma and Anr. Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors.

Dr.Sanjay Kumar Suman Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.

Ruplal Gope Vs Jharkhand Academic Council Ranchi Through Its Chairman And Ors.

Jagdish Gour Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.

Gopal Mahto Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.