Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to raise arguments later. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Application for withdrawal permitted; application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise points later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 2696 of 2014
Vijay Sao … Petitioner.
-V e r s u s-
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR.
For the Petitioner : - Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Vikash Kishore, A.P.P.
03/05.05.2015
After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise all the points taken in this application at the appropriate stage.
With the aforesaid liberty, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
( Prashant Kumar, J.)
sunil/
Vijay Sao
The State of Jharkhand
Jaggarnath Sao
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
