Petitioners failed to appear. The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the main criminal miscellaneous petition for non-prosecution. An infructuousI.A. was also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.1148 of 2005
….. Petitioners
Versus
…. Respondents
Coram: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioners : None For the State : APP
17/09.03.2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. This application is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
I.A. No. 834 of 2006
Since the main application has been dismissed for non prosecution, instant I.A. has ,therefore, become infructuous. This I.A is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
Rakesh/
Ram Sewak Singh and Others
State of Jharkhand and Others
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
