Petitioners moved to withdraw a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and lack of objection from the opposite party.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No. 2628 of 2013 1. Smt. Kunti Devi, W/o Manik Chand Prasad Verma 2.Pratima Verma @ Pratima Kumari D/o Manik Chand Verma 3.Gauttum Verma, s/o Manik Chand Prasad Verma 4.Vikash Verma @ Vikash Kumar s/o Maink Chand Prasad Verma All are resident of Ram Tekari Raod, Naya Bazar, P.O & P.S. Jugsalai, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum
….. …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Sayukta Verma, wife of Sri Uttam Verma, resident of Begunia Colliery, P.O & P.S Barakar, District Vardhaman (W.Bengal) ….. …. Opposite Parties --CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --For the Petitioners : Mr. Arbind Kumar, Advoate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, Advocate --- Order No. 11 Dated 4th March, 2015
Mr. Arbind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application in view of the fact that final form has already been submitted by the police.
Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 does not have any objection to such prayer. This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.)
MK
Kunti Devi
Pratima Verma
Gauttum Verma
Vikash Verma
State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
