An anticipatory bail application was dismissed by the High Court of Jharkhand on the ground that process under sections 82/83 CrPC had already been issued against the petitioner, rendering the application non-maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3617 of 2015
Kuku @ Kuku Rawani... ... ... ... ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand... ... ... ... Opp. Party.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Ravi Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
05/ 03.12.2015:
Heard Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. Ravi Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State.
At the outset it has been submitted by the learned A.P.P. that process under sections 82/83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have already been issued.
In view of such submission this anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. It is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
Sharma/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application is maintainable when process under sections 82/83 CrPC has already been issued.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kuku @ Kuku Rawani
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
