The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the application (B.A. No. 2372 of 2015) and dismissed it as withdrawn, with no substantive order or reasoning provided beyond the withdrawal.
Permission accorded to withdraw the application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2372 of 2015
…..
Akash Agarwal @ Akash Kumar Agarwal son of Binu Agarwal resident of Kalubathan P.O and P.S Nirsa Dist. Dhanbad
…. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anjani Kr. Toppo, A.P.P.
03/ Dated 10th September, 2015
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Anjali
Akash Agarwal @ Akash Kumar Agarwal
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
