Sakaldev Yadav and Ors. v. The State Of Jharkhand And Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand addressed a plea for anticipatory bail regarding non-compoundable offences involving armed entry and assault. The court rejected the initial prayer for anticipatory bail but permitted seeking regular bail within three weeks if a compromise is reached.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioners directed to seek regular bail within three weeks with informant and injured, if any, accompanied by a compromise petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A.No. 2354 of 2015
- Sakaldev Yadav.
- Suraj Yadav @ Suraj Kumar.
- Bablu Yadav @ Babloo Yadav.
- Kisun Yadav. … ...Petitioners
-Versus-
- The State of Jharkhand. 2. Muna Yadav. … ...Opp. Party
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY
For the Petitioners: Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P.
03/13.08.2015 The petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 452/323/506/307/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Katras (Tetulmari) P.S. Case No. 83/2015, corresponding to G.R.No. 1259/2015, pending in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of non-compoundable offences involving use of arms and causing injury.
Whether settlement of dispute and distant relationship warrants anticipatory bail in offences under IPC and Arms Act.
Whether prayer for bail should be considered under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the nature of allegations including entry with a pistol.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sakaldev Yadav
- petitioner
Suraj Yadav
- petitioner
Bablu Yadav
- petitioner
Kisun Yadav
- respondent
State of Jharkhand
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./2354/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court