situated over an area of 0.11 acre. Accordingly, he recommended creation of jamabandi in favour of respondent nos. 3 to 7 over the rest of the land. The record was forwarded to the Land Reforms Deputy Collector, who also examined the records and recommended creation of jamabandi with respect to 1.59 acres of land in favour of the legal heirs of the khatiany raiyat, that is, respondent nos. 3 to 7. Order dated 02.06.2011 of the Additional Collector, Latehar discloses that in Khata No. 40, Plot Nos. 74, 116 and 118 an area of 2.35 acre is recorded in the survey khatian in the name of Musaheb Khan who was the predecessor-in-interest of respondent nos. 3 to 7. However, an area of 0.60 acre in Plot No. 116 was sold by Justina Oraon to Antony Bara and vide Misc. Case No. 32 of 1993-94, the demand with respect to the rest of the land is created in the name of Justina Oraon. However, no evidence was produced by the opposite party how the demand was created in her name. She has produced an unregistered agreement to sale executed by the predecessor-in-interest of the respondent nos. 3 to 7. The Additional Collector observed that in the revenue record the name has been transferred illegally and the opposite party has illegally sold an area of 0.60 acres of land. The Additional Collector, Latehar approved the recommendation for creation for jamabandi in favour of respondent nos. 3 to 7 with respect to an area of 1.59 acre in Khata No. 40, Plot Nos. 74 and 118. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Additional Collector being the Appellate
