Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a writ petition on theGround that it had become infructuous. The court accorded permission and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Permission is accorded to withdraw the writ petition; the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.1859 of 2010
Md. Aftab Alam & Others
... ...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Others .. ... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : M/s. Nilesh Kumar, Vijyant Verma, Advocates, For the Respondent-State:J.C. to Sr. S.C.-II
04/02.12.2014 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition as the same has become infructuous.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
( Shree Chandrashekhar, J .)
Satyarthi/-
Md. Aftab Alam & Others
The State of Jharkhand & Others
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
