Dismissed
Siblal Marandi v. Road Construction
Jharkhand HCWPC/1506/2013
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition for withdrawal permitted and dismissed. No substantive legal principle established.
What the court decided
AI extract
Writ petition for withdrawal permitted and dismissed. No substantive legal principle established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No. 1506 of 2013
Siblal Marandi ... … Petitioner
-Versus-
The State of Jharkhand and ors. ... ... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
For the Petitioner :Mr. B.N.Rajak For the Respondents :Mr. Rajesh Kumar
7- 10.03.2014 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition in order to pursue his representation before the respondent-authority.
Prayer is allowed and this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pandey
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J. )
Sibal Marandi
The State of Jharkhand
Aparesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court