Gajadhar Rajak v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P.…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cr. M. P. No. 2637 of 2013
Gajadhar Rajak ..... Petitioner(s)
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Gouri S. Prasad, A.P.P. -----
02 /11.02.2014. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that upon search and seizure being effected by the Block Supply Inspector, a case has been registered against the petitioner being a dealer under the Public Distribution System, but on the day when the search and seizure was effected, the Block Supply Inspector had never been authorized by the State Government in terms of Clause 10 of the Public Distribution System [Control] Order, 2001 and, therefore, any prosecution of the petitioner would be bad, in view of the ratio laid down in the case of A loke Dutta Vs. State of Jharkhand [2013(2) East Cr. C. 133 (Jhrl )].
As prayed for, on behalf of the State, let this matter be listed on 4.03.2014 so that in the meantime, counter-affidavit be filed.
Let a copy of the order be handed-over to the learned counsel appearing for the State for needful.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether prosecution of the petitioner is maintainable when the Block Supply Inspector conducting the search had not been authorized by the State Government as per Clause 10 of the Public Distribution
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gajadhar Rajak
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
R. R. Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cr.M.P./2637/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court