The High Court condoned the delay in filing a restoration petition under C.M.P. No. 483 of 2012. Relying on prior orders with similar facts, the Court allowed the petition and restored Tax Appeal No. 49 of 2006 to its original number.
C.M.P. No. 483 of 2012 allowed; Tax Appeal No. 49 of 2006 restored to original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 483 of 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi
.... .... .... Petitioner Versus Sri Madan Lal Jain .... .... .... Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Roshan, Advocate For the Respondent : -----
Order No.04 Dated, 3rd July, 2013
Delay in filing this restoration petition is condoned in view of the fact that the Tax Appeal No. 49 of 2006 was dismissed without notice to the parties and there is no need to issue notice to the respondent on the application for condonation of delay.
In view of the reasons given in the order dated 19th September, 2012 passed in C.M.P No. 452 of 2011 (The Commissioner of Income Tax(Central), Patna Vs. Jai Prakash Singhania) and in view of the similar facts involved in the dismissal of the Tax Appeal No. 49 of 2006, this C.M.P is allowed and Tax Appeal No. 49 of 2006 is restored to its original number.
(Prakash Tatia, C. J.)
(Jaya Roy , J.)
SI/Anit
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi
Sri Madan Lal Jain
Jaya Roy
Prakash Tatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
