The petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition citing a pending amicable settlement between the parties. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, retaining liberty to approach the court afresh if settlement fails.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to approach court afresh if settlement fails.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.61 Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 71/2026 CM(1074/2026) CM(3158/2026).
Akhter Ali Mugal.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mohammad Saleem Mir, Advocate.
VERSUS
Zulaikha Bano.
Through: None.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE.
ORDER 15.09.2026
on record.
case the settlement does not materialize.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 15.09.2026 Bisma Jan.
Akhter Ali Mugal
Zulaikha Bano
M. A. CHOWDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
