This order dismisses a writ petition for want of prosecution due to lack of representation and apparent loss of interest by the petitioners. All connected匆匆 orders remain operative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 33 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 261/2023 CM(6172/2023)
Ali Mohammad Dar & Anr.
...Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: -
None.
V/s
Mukhtar Ahmad Mir & Ors.
… Respondent(s)
Through:-
Ms. Shah Bareera Fatima, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG for R- 3 to 5.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE. (ORDER)
14.09.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. So was the
case on previous two dates of hearing as well. It seems that the Petitioners
have lost interest to prosecute this case any further.
Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, along
with connected CM(s).
Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
September 14th , 2026 “Shoaib javid”
Ali Mohammad Dar
Mukhtar Ahmad Mir
M. A. CHOWDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
