The petition was dismissed as infructuous after both parties' counsel stated at Bar that the matter had become infructuous.
Petition and connected application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 75
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM(M) No. 170/2025 CM No. 3580/2025
Vipul Kohli
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Aman Bhagotra, Advocate.
v/s
Sonia Kohli and another
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Atharv Mahajan, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 18.09.2026
Learned counsel for the parties have stated at Bar that the instant petition
has rendered infructuous.
The statements of learned counsels are taken on record. The petition is accordingly, dismissed, along with connected application,
as being rendered infructuous.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 18.09.2026 Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar 2026.09.19 14:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Vipul Kohli
Sonia Kohli
and another
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
